From the delirious highs of 158p to the shocking lows of 3.50p, Empyrean Energy is certainly one of the more well-travelled shares. The company floated in mid-2005 in order to pursue oil and gas opportunities in geopolitically stable regions of the world. In line with this stated strategy, the Board carried out a series of acquisitions in the first couple of years. They begun with the now very much defunct Glantal Gas resource near Frankfurt, Germany. This was followed shortly by working interests in California and Texas: the Eagle Oil Development Project (now 57% working interest) and the Sugarloaf Project (3% WI), respectively. And finally, in 2009 the company acquired a 10% working interest in the Riverbend Project, also situated in Texas. There were a couple of other projects but they are not worth going into detail here.
Throughout the years a number of problems were encountered in each of the working interests acquired, and the share price reflected this. Hence the depressing dive down to 3.50p in 2009, a mere 9% of the IPO share price. The Glantal Gas Project never produced meaningful results and news flows regarding it ceased fairly promptly. The Eagle Oil Project in California turned dormant during 2006 after a well was drilled and abandoned due to “technical problems”. Of what kind one can only speculate. The Riverbend Project in Texas remained largely undeveloped although one successful well was drilled which still produces oil and gas today.
All this talk of failure shall here-on halt, for Empyrean have and continue to drag their assets back from the cliff-edge and into production. Their saving grace was the Sugarloaf Project which targets the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas. The resource has proven to be one of the most productive unconventional oil and gas plays in the USA ever. When the scale of this project’s potential was learned it promptly became the primary concern and other project developments were halted to conserve capital.
The project was originally operated by Hillcorp Energy, but in 2012 operatorship was transferred to Marathon Oil. The new company entered the scene with an aggressive drilling schedule which was implemented from Q2 2012. This was welcome news for Empyrean because a heavier drilling schedule meant that production rates would be ramped up at a significantly quicker pace.
After a year of Marathon in control, the number of producing wells on Empyrean’s acreage has increased by over 200% from 24 producing wells to over 72. This has entirely transformed the company’s flow rates. In March 2012, Empyrean was producing around 125 boe/d (barrels of oil equivalent / day) while in March 2013, only a year on, production rates are expected to be five times greater at circa 800 boe/d. Put simply, this is unprecedented growth. All of which has entirely been ignored by the market, as can be seen by the depressed share price.
This proposed undervaluation is supported when we consider the most recent Independent Reserves Report (IRR) for Empyrean’s acreage on the Sugarloaf Project. The report, issued in December 2012 increased proved reserves of oil by 54.4% to 2.32 MMBBL (million barrels of oil). If we ignorantly multiply this by an assumed price of $90 for one barrel of oil we come to an undiscounted aggregate revenue amount of $209M.
A more conventional gauge of value would be to refer to the NPV of the reserves. However, the latest IRR did not disclose them for fear of unwelcome predators, so we can only refer to the IRR issued in October 2011 which estimated the 1P reserve NPV to be $30.8M. Note that this figure does not capture the 54.4% increase in reserves, nor does it capture the accelerated drilling schedule and it also does not account for the year that has passed for discounting purposes. We can therefore safely and conservatively estimate the NPV by increasing this figure by about 60% – the 54.3% plus a little more to account for the change in drilling schedule- which returns a figure of $52M. I would like to now remind the reader that the current market cap for Empyrean Energy is currently $20M.
So it would appear that Empyrean is trading significantly beneath its estimated NPV value for the proven reserves of the Sugarloaf Project and we have not even considered the Riverbend or the Eagle Oil Projects, each of which have considerably larger working interests, although admittedly do not share quite the same stellar quality as Sugarloaf.
This punishment by the market could be down to the share’s historical under-performance, causing investors to remain wary and sceptical of Empyrean’s apparent turnaround. After all, official proof of the value I speak of has not shown itself yet. A proposed event which should give us ample proof would be the year end results. A significant ramp up in revenues and profits would flag to the market that considerable value exists where it previously had not been accounted for. It is not long now until the annual results are released, so the truth may be out soon.
I will continue this new thread with further information on Empyrean’s operations, including the more recent developments and I shall also paint the technical back-drop.